“I’ve had two years to grow claws, mother- Jungle red!” “The Women”(1939) Written: Lauren



Well I have finally come to my all time favorite year in Hollywood history, 1939. Arguably the best year in cinema history, more films made and released during this year have remained classic cinematic masterpieces than any other year to date. I could go on and on about Gone With the Wind, The Wizard of Oz, Stagecoach, Mr. Smith Goes to Washington, Dark Victory, Wuthering Heights et cetera. But for today I will stick with a film that has remained one of my top ten favorites for years. George Cukor’s 1939 bitch fest film, The Women.

Forget the God awful 2008 remake starring Meg Ryan. Think of Mean Girls (2004) before there was an Amy Poehler walking around in a pink jump suit flaunting her newly sculpted bosom. The dialogue and story line in The Women is so fast, so perfectly delivered, and somewhat racy yet realistic that even after seventy-six years women can still relate. 

I could write a twenty page thesis on this film but for the readers sake, I will stick to a few aspects of the film that I find most interesting. First Mommie Dearest herself, Joan Crawford. Crawford’s beautiful face had adorned the screen for some time before The Women was made, and it would continue to for over thirty years. Yes her best performance is arguably in Michael Curtiz’s 1945 Academy Award winning film, Mildred Pierce, but in The Women we see a different type of performance that she will never again duplicate during her career. Maybe it’s because the character of Crystal Allen resembles Crawford herself perfectly. She plays a money hungry, low class, husband stealing, will do anything to make it to the top, manipulating, absolutely gorgeous bitch. Her character never apologizes for being such, and by the end of the film the audience understands that Crystal will never have what all the other women have or want. A family and a loving, faithful husband.



Thankfully George Cukor was able to pull a performance out of Crawford in which she is a masterful seductress who detests Norma Shearer’s character Mary Haines, more than her job as a perfume girl. How Cukor was ever able to finish this picture in a sane mind set is beyond me. Crawford and Shearer notoriously had bad blood with each other dating back to 1927 when Shearer married MGM “Boy Wonder”, Irving Thalberg. Crawford was even quoted at one point in saying, “How can I compete with Norma when she’s sleeping with the boss?”. The two hated each other so much that they each refused to walk into publicity shooting for the film because neither one wanted to walk in first.



Crawford, Cukor and Shearer taking part in awatermelon eating contest on set.

Crawford wasn’t the only one that had issues with Shearer during production. In Rosalind Russell’s autobiography she stated that Shearer refused to share top billing. Subsequently Russell called in sick and stayed sick, haulting production, until Shearer agreed to share. Ironically the pettiness that was shown on screen mirrored the fiasco that was happening off screen.

But enough about drama. After watching this film for at least the tenth time I noticied another element of this film that I had really never thought profoundly about before, the mother/daughter relationship. Mary’s mother, played by character actress Lucile Watson, depicts one of the best portrayals of a strong mother/daughter bond I have yet to see up until that point in cinema. The way in which she looks at her daughter, comforts her, goofs around with her and gives her advice illustrates a mama bear mentality that many woman exude towards their children. Take for instance this line, which may be one of the best pieces of advice a woman can hear.

He’s not tired of you, he’s tired of himself. He’s tired of feeling the same thing’s in himself. Times come when a man has to feel something new, when he’s got to feel young again just because he’s growing old. We women are so much more sensible when we tire of ourselves. We change the we way we do our hair, or cook, or decorate the house. I suppose a man could do over his office but he never thinks of something so simple. No dear, a man has only one escape from his old self. To see a different self in the mirror of some women’s eyes. 


If that’s not good screen writing, I don’t know what is! Mary’s mother goes as far as to drive her to a train station headed for the divorcee capital of the world in the 1930’s Reno. A place that represents a women’s choice, and a taboo that was severely shunned by Hollywood screenplay’s through out most of cinema’s infamous Production Code era. 

I said it before and I’ll say it again, I could go on and on about this film. Such as Rosalind Russell’s hilariously sad depiction of a woman consumed by gossip, the issues that plague most marriages, and the absolute cruelty women bestow upon each other. Yes this may be a “chick flick” from the 1930’s but it’s a rather good one. It’s quick, tragic and hilarious. So men, If you ever want to witness the brutality of gossiping women and the utmost manipulation tactics women can perform, do not look to your ex, go watch The Women.




6 thoughts on ““I’ve had two years to grow claws, mother- Jungle red!” “The Women”(1939) Written: Lauren

  1. With Bette Davis, the feud was much more lively and public, because Davis wouldn’t hesitate to add her own supply of gasoline to the fire. The earlier, and longer-lived feud with Shearer had to be much more frustrating for Joan because Norma chose to remain mute and aloof. Joan’s apologists would love to put denigrating words in Norma’s mouth against Joan, but you will search in vain trying to find any.

    I agree that Lucile Watson is outstanding in the film, but Mrs. Morehead’s advice to her daughter is both wonderful in spots and terrible in another. “Mary, you’re not to say in front of Stephen and until you’ve thought this out, and thought it out very calmly.” “Don’t confide in your girlfriends. If you let them advise you, they’ll see to it in the name of friendship that you lose your husband and your home.”

    That’s perfect: at that point, Mary knew the truth, but Stephen doesn’t know Mary knows, and so she has time to strategize. And given the ‘friends’ Mary has the wisdom in the second piece hardly needs stating!

    However, “Keep still, keep still when you’re fairly aching to talk. It’s about the only sacrifice spoiled women like us ever have to make to keep our men,” is dreadful counsel. To do here as her mother suggests, is to quietly acquiesce in Stephen’s unfaithfulness, while likely a succession of Crystal Allens pass through their lives, and that’s no marriage.

    At that point in the film, I’m dying to see Mrs. Morehead to her car, remind her that she’s a woman of means herself, and that perhaps a good private detective could likely document a history of Crystal Allen that would do an able job of disenchanting her son-in-law. And Mary’s fingerprints need be nowhere on the matter.

    Liked by 1 person

    1. Dave, thank you for the comment! I agree with most of your points. But don’t you agree her mothers advice throughout the picture was far different than modern ideals on marriage at that time? At the same time, the unsound advice/dialogue can appeal to particular audiences ideals that time. It’s almost as if the script was written to appeal to a vast audience.

      Liked by 1 person

      1. That’s true too. For the time and for that moment, yes. Alls well that ends well, but had Mary not gotten the divorce, and kept quiet while Stephen cheated, she would soon have the added job, as Little Mary moved into adolescence, of shielding her from the truth of her father in hope of not skewering young Mary’s outlook on marriage as well.

        While we’re talking about mother/daughter bonding here, we should certainly salute how well it extended a generation further. The relaxed and natural relationship Shearer and Weidler portray makes a marvelous oasis from the backstabbing elsewhere. Cukor’s greatest gift to Weidler was probably the moment young Mary gets to remind Crystal of her manners and to say ‘please,’ something I think we can feel assured no kid got to do with Crawford in real life. 😮

        Memorable as they are here, Weidler and Watson would double their triumphs in a year, respectively as Katherine Hepburn’s kid sister, and Vivien Leigh’s prospective mother-in-law. MGM knew how to make ’em. 🙂

        Liked by 1 person

  2. As for the billing matter, according to Norma’s 1990 biography by Gavin Lambert (Knopf), here’s how it went down:

    “Norma’s contract still ensured that her name was billed above her leading man’s and vetoed costar billing for any actress. A week before The Women began production, Mayer asked her to make an exception in Crawford’s case. At first she objected, but on May 3, 1939, yielded to pressure again and signed an amendment:

    ‘I now agree that, notwithstanding the provision of paragraph 18 of my contract of employment with you dated June 14, 1937, Miss Joan Crawford may be given co-star credit with my name. The waiver to apply only to The Women.’

    It was the thin edge of the wedge. Russell, whose part was larger than Crawford’s, asked her agent to apply for a similar waiver. Norma refused. A month into shooting, Mayer heard favorable reports of Russell’s performance and told her, “I hear you’re going to steal this picture,” which encouraged her to try again but change her tactics. During a week when she was not on call, her agent told the studio that Miss Russell was sick and might not be well enough to work the following week. On June 13, Norma signed another amendment:

    ‘I now agree that both Miss Joan Crawford and Miss Rosalind Russell may be given co-star credit with my name; provided, however, that in no event shall Miss Russell’s name appear in size of type larger than 50% of the size used to display my name.”


    “With Russell the tension remained strictly professional, one actress determined to steal the picture, the other to walk away with it against all odds. At the end of shooting Norma threw a lavish party on the set, with an orchestra for dancing. Joan did not attend. Among the guests was [Ernst] Lubitsch, who told Russell mischievously as she went into a fox trot with Cukor, “If you want all of your close-ups to stay in the picture, better dance with Norma.” Amused, Russell reported this to Norma, who gave one of her most brilliant smiles and held out her arms. Cheek to cheek, they whirled together past Lubitsch.”

    Liked by 1 person

    1. Thanks for the further research Dave! Ironic you just posted this. I am currently watching “Ted”, TV dinner and movie night. Mark Wallberg just said, “Someone needs to go Joan Crawford on his ass”.

      Like

  3. In mid-1942, after the cool reception of Her Cardboard Lover, what would prove Shearer’s final film, Norma married a skiing-instructor a decade younger than she, and retired to a second happy marriage that would last till the end of her life in June 1983. She was not pro-active in keeping her legacy alive, and thus went neglected until the 1990s with Turner Classic Movies, and the help of a number of informed authors.

    In the early days of 1939 however, Norma was the one of the principal three with the most clout. While Crawford and Russell had to lobby for their parts, producer Hunt Stromberg had wanted Norma from the very first as Mary Haines. So did Louis B. Mayer, for her box-office value; Marie Antoinette had been a prestigious, multi-Oscar nominated triumph the year before.

    Norma was not thrilled, found Mary bland and “too noble,” as well as privately nervous of appearing with so many actresses younger than she, but she was also a trooper and a ‘company man’ since the founding of the studio. Even following the film’s tremendously warm reception, Norma did not count Mary among her favored work, and she was wrong. Her adroit, light-touch approach to the part is a study is giving the best by consciously not giving too much.

    Crawford’s career was in a slump by the latter 1930s, and she’d actually taken a per-picture pay cut in 1938, for the safely of the longest contract terms she could get. While privately relishing a confrontation with Shearer, she also knew the remorseless Crystal would be a striking and vivid presence in the picture among the genteel society women. A risk yes, and really a glorified supporting part, but also a strong role in a sure hit, something Crawford needed at that moment.

    Crawford biographer Stephen Harvey noted, “Basically this tramp is just the wicked stepsister to all the slum-to-duplex heroines Crawford had patented for nearly a decade. Like Sadie and Jessie and Flaemmchen, Crystal grapples for her share of the gravy, but without all that malarkey about love, virtue and fidelity. Usually wealth is the fringe benefit, and a worthy man the goal, but in The Women Crawford reverses the priorities.”

    Incredibly, in 1939 Russell was unproven in comedy and she knew Sylvia Fowler was just the plum to remedy that. She had to win over George Cukor who wanted Ilka Chase from the stage production to repeat her part, but admitted that Cukor had made her test “with all the zeal under the sun,” and shown himself a helpful ally throughout the filming.

    Cary Grant and the part of reporter Hildy Johnson was waiting in the wings after The Women, itself another timeless comedy classic, and after these two nobody ever questioned again whether Russell could make audiences laugh.

    You’ve good reason to hold 1939 the best year in American films, and I certainly agree with you.

    Like

Leave a comment